Sign InSign Up

What P2P lending paid in 2025

Every year we calculate the net return of the portfolios tracked in P2P Dash, per platform. Not advertised rates, not platform averages, just the money that actually arrived in 2,078 real portfolios.

Median net return across all platforms

12.1%

2024: 10.3%

Middle 50% of portfolios
9.4% – 15.9%
Platforms with enough data
46
Portfolios measured
1,170
Complete yearData through October 28, 2026

What P2P lending returned, year by year

Median net return (XIRR) per calendar year across all portfolios tracked on P2P Dash, platforms combined.

10.9%

2015

11.8%

2016

11.3%

2017

11.1%

2018

11.3%

2019

9.6%

2020

9.1%

2021

8.0%

2022

9.8%

2023

10.3%

2024

12.1%

2025

11.5%

2026

Return excluding cashbackAdded by cashback

Years with too few tracked portfolios are left out. 2026 is still running.

Returns by platform in 2025

Median net return (XIRR) of the portfolios our users track on each platform, after defaults and fees. The range next to it is where the middle half of those portfolios landed.

  1. 1Asterra Estate
    Asterra Estate
    Portfolios: 53
    30.9%
    Middle 50%: 30.3% – 32.3%
  2. 2Ventus Energy
    Ventus Energy
    Portfolios: 257
    29.1%
    Middle 50%: 24.9% – 33.7%
  3. 3Devon
    Devon
    Portfolios: 80
    24.9%
    Middle 50%: 23.2% – 27.7%
  4. 4Maclear
    Maclear
    Portfolios: 187
    20.4%
    Middle 50%: 16.2% – 27.3%
  5. 5LenderMarket
    LenderMarket
    Portfolios: 138
    19.5%
    Middle 50%: 16.0% – 22.6%
  6. 6Nectaro
    Nectaro
    Portfolios: 135
    17.0%
    Middle 50%: 15.4% – 20.0%
  7. 7Loanch
    Loanch
    Portfolios: 78
    15.8%
    Middle 50%: 14.3% – 17.3%
  8. 8Hive5
    Hive5
    Portfolios: 103
    14.6%
    Middle 50%: 13.5% – 15.2%
  9. 9Quanloop
    Quanloop
    Portfolios: 20
    14.6%
    Middle 50%: 11.2% – 16.0%
  10. 10Debitum
    Debitum
    Portfolios: 361
    14.5%
    Middle 50%: 13.5% – 16.1%
  11. 11Afranga
    Afranga
    Portfolios: 99
    14.1%
    Middle 50%: 13.5% – 15.3%
  12. 12Bienprêter
    Bienprêter
    Portfolios: 61
    13.8%
    Middle 50%: 12.6% – 15.1%
  13. 13Finbee
    Finbee
    Portfolios: 17
    13.7%
    Middle 50%: 12.7% – 15.2%
  14. 14Stikcredit
    Stikcredit
    Portfolios: 21
    13.5%
    Middle 50%: 12.6% – 14.3%
  15. 15Crowdestor
    Crowdestor
    Portfolios: 17
    13.3%
    Middle 50%: 6.1% – 21.9%
  16. 16Swaper
    Swaper
    Portfolios: 187
    12.9%
    Middle 50%: 11.9% – 14.2%
  17. 17Crowdpear
    Crowdpear
    Portfolios: 67
    12.3%
    Middle 50%: 10.9% – 16.4%
  18. 18Modena
    Modena
    Portfolios: 33
    12.3%
    Middle 50%: 10.7% – 15.9%
  19. 19Twino
    Twino
    Portfolios: 143
    12.2%
    Middle 50%: 10.3% – 13.1%
  20. 20Viainvest
    Viainvest
    Portfolios: 325
    12.1%
    Middle 50%: 11.4% – 12.7%
  21. 21Income
    Income
    Portfolios: 240
    11.9%
    Middle 50%: 10.4% – 13.0%
  22. 22Esketit
    Esketit
    Portfolios: 230
    11.3%
    Middle 50%: 10.5% – 12.3%
  23. 23Mintos
    Mintos
    Portfolios: 588
    11.2%
    Middle 50%: 9.1% – 13.0%
  24. 24Kviku
    Kviku
    Portfolios: 10
    11.0%
    Middle 50%: 9.7% – 12.0%
  25. 25Scramble
    Scramble
    Portfolios: 16
    10.6%
    Middle 50%: 8.0% – 12.0%
  26. 26Iuvo
    Iuvo
    Portfolios: 35
    10.5%
    Middle 50%: 8.6% – 11.6%
  27. 27Fintown
    Fintown
    Portfolios: 131
    10.1%
    Middle 50%: 7.3% – 13.8%
  28. 28Inrento
    Inrento
    Portfolios: 57
    10.1%
    Middle 50%: 8.5% – 11.7%
  29. 29Capitalia
    Capitalia
    Portfolios: 33
    9.9%
    Middle 50%: 9.2% – 11.2%
  30. 30Robocash
    Robocash
    Portfolios: 211
    9.9%
    Middle 50%: 9.1% – 10.7%
  31. 31Lande
    Lande
    Portfolios: 223
    9.5%
    Middle 50%: 8.1% – 10.6%
  32. 32Peerberry
    Peerberry
    Portfolios: 281
    9.2%
    Middle 50%: 8.2% – 10.0%
  33. 33Monefit
    Monefit
    Portfolios: 262
    8.5%
    Middle 50%: 7.4% – 9.5%
  34. 34Bricks
    Bricks
    Portfolios: 21
    8.4%
    Middle 50%: 7.8% – 9.6%
  35. 35InSoil
    InSoil
    Portfolios: 50
    8.1%
    Middle 50%: 3.6% – 11.4%
  36. 36Axiafunder
    Axiafunder
    Portfolios: 10
    7.3%
    Middle 50%: 6.5% – 8.1%
  37. 37La Première Brique
    La Première Brique
    Portfolios: 25
    6.6%
    Middle 50%: 5.1% – 14.0%
  38. 38Indemo
    Indemo
    Portfolios: 199
    6.2%
    Middle 50%: 3.2% – 10.0%
  39. 39Go & Grow
    Go & Grow
    Portfolios: 368
    6.2%
    Middle 50%: 6.1% – 6.2%
  40. 40Brickstarter
    Brickstarter
    Portfolios: 16
    5.5%
    Middle 50%: 4.4% – 6.8%
  41. 41Bondster
    Bondster
    Portfolios: 16
    5.4%
    Middle 50%: 3.4% – 9.2%
  42. 42Enerfip
    Enerfip
    Portfolios: 12
    4.4%
    Middle 50%: 3.0% – 6.0%
  43. 43Tantiem
    Tantiem
    Portfolios: 12
    4.3%
    Middle 50%: 2.7% – 5.1%
  44. 44wecity
    wecity
    Portfolios: 45
    2.9%
    Middle 50%: 1.1% – 5.4%
  45. 45CivisLend
    CivisLend
    Portfolios: 37
    1.9%
    Middle 50%: 0.6% – 4.8%
  46. 46Estateguru
    Estateguru
    Portfolios: 150
    1.4%
    Middle 50%: -0.8% – 5.3%

Biggest improvement

Platforms that gained the most against their own 2024 figure, in percentage points of return.

  1. 1Crowdestor
    Crowdestor
    Portfolios: 17
    +8.1%
    Median return: 13.3%
  2. 2LenderMarket
    LenderMarket
    Portfolios: 138
    +4.5%
    Median return: 19.5%
  3. 3Afranga
    Afranga
    Portfolios: 99
    +3.4%
    Median return: 14.1%
  4. 4Stikcredit
    Stikcredit
    Portfolios: 21
    +2.8%
    Median return: 13.5%
  5. 5Fintown
    Fintown
    Portfolios: 131
    +2.6%
    Median return: 10.1%

Biggest decline

Platforms that lost the most against their own 2024 figure.

  1. 1Nectaro
    Nectaro
    Portfolios: 135
    -5.2%
    Median return: 17.0%
  2. 2Estateguru
    Estateguru
    Portfolios: 150
    -4.4%
    Median return: 1.4%
  3. 3Bondster
    Bondster
    Portfolios: 16
    -3.4%
    Median return: 5.4%
  4. 4CivisLend
    CivisLend
    Portfolios: 37
    -3.3%
    Median return: 1.9%
  5. 5Quanloop
    Quanloop
    Portfolios: 20
    -2.4%
    Median return: 14.6%

How these numbers are made

  • Every figure is an XIRR calculated from transaction data imported by P2P Dash users: the return the money actually earned, after defaults and fees, not the rate a platform advertises.
  • A platform is listed for a year once at least 10 tracked portfolios cover it. The privacy pipeline suppresses smaller cohorts before we ever see them; this floor sits on top of that, because a median over a handful of portfolios is not worth citing.
  • The median is the middle portfolio, not an average, so one outsized portfolio cannot pull it. The range next to it shows where the middle half landed, which says more about a platform than the median alone.
  • These are our users' returns, not a platform's total book. They describe a sample of engaged retail investors, which is exactly the number platforms never publish about themselves.
  • Past years are not frozen. When somebody imports years of history, a closed year gains portfolios and its median can still move. Every page is rebuilt nightly; what you see is the state of the data on October 28, 2026.

These figures are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Please credit P2P Dash and link back to this page.

Earlier years

Every year keeps its own page, so a link you share keeps working, and the figures on it stay up to date as more history is imported.

About this data: The figures on this page are aggregated from anonymized data that P2P Dash users import themselves, plus platform details we maintain by hand. We check both, but we cannot guarantee that they are complete or free of errors. Spotted a mistake? Write to tim@newnow.de and we will correct it.

Inside P2P Dash

See your own return, not just the median

Import your platform exports and P2P Dash shows your XIRR per platform and per year: the same calculation behind this page, run on your portfolio.